The Rise of No-Cash Bail and Progressive Prosecutors

Cash bail systems, once ubiquitous, required defendants to pay for release pending trial—effectively making wealth a determinant of that freedom. Reformers argued rightly that such systems disproportionately penalized the poor. States like Illinois passed the SAFE-T Act, abolishing cash bail in favor of risk-based release systems.

Cities like San Francisco followed suit under progressive DAs like Chesa Boudin, implementing risk-based assessments and diversion programs targeting low-level offenses. Meanwhile, reformist prosecutors across the nation embraced de-criminalization and reduced sentencing, aiming to reduce incarceration and systemic inequalities.

The Crime Backlash—Perception Meets Reality

Public backlash in many communities emerged when residents perceived that reforms had permitted rising disorder—even when data didn’t confirm a direct causal link.

For instance, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, accused by conservative voices of “decarceration,” has been blamed for rising fare evasion, downgrading of felonies, and unchecked crime in the subway system.

Similarly, in New York State, Governor Kathy Hochul faces growing political pressure to rollback cash bail reform amid criticism that it fosters unsafe streets—even though Mayor Adams points out that NYC shootings and subway felonies remain far below historic highs.

What the Data Actually Shows

Evidence does not support a link between no-cash bail or progressive prosecution and increased crime. Major studies conclude bail reform did not statistically raise crime rates.

• The Brennan Center for Justice analyzed 22 cities with bail reform against 11 without and found no significant uptick in violent or property crime.

• Further reports reiterated: “no statistically significant relationship between bail reform and crime rates”.

• Even media examinations debunk alarmist rhetoric around bail reform, showing crime rates continually declined or hovered steady in many big cities implementing these policies.

Still, in Some Cities Crime Spiked—or at Least Feelings Did

Despite calm in the data, some cities saw real or perceived unrest.

San Francisco, under DA Boudin, saw surges in certain crimes—car burglaries, property theft, and visible street disorder—that fueled public dissatisfaction. That dissatisfaction helped drive his recall in 2022.

Likewise, Portland experimented with police defunding, decriminalization, and reduced prosecutions. The result? A public feeling of lawlessness. Businesses shuttered, violence surged, and rogue vigilante groups emerged. The city then reversed course to restore funding and rehire officers.

Myth vs. Reality in Public Discourse

A dangerous myth persists: that reform = rising crime. This oversimplifies a complex issue and misattributes causation.

For Washington, D.C.—a longstanding cashless bail jurisdiction—President Trump has called it “lawless” and even threatened National Guard deployment. In reality, violent crime has dropped significantly, with homicide and juvenile arrests trending downward.

Even critics acknowledge these claims are more political narrative than fact, as multiple metrics show improving conditions.

Cities Without Reform Also Struggle

It’s also important to contextualize: crime is not just rising in left-leaning cities. America’s most violent rates today are often in rural communities across the South and West—not urban jurisdictions with progressive reforms. States like Louisiana, Tennessee, Alabama, Alaska, and New Mexico report high per-capita homicides, often outpacing big cities in violent crime rates.

Why the Perception-Data Gap?

Several factors contribute to the feeling that reform is synonymous with increased crime:

• Media Focus: Dramatic footage of street crime or disorder spikes attention—even when rare.

• Policy Lag: Real-world benefits like lower incarceration take time; disruptions are felt earlier.

• Legitimate Police Vacuums: Rapid cuts to enforcement or diverging prosecutorial priorities may leave short-term gaps that community members feel.

• Emotional Impact: Even a few high-profile incidents can generate fear and outrage.

Crafting Safe, Smart Reform

1. Hold Prosecutors Accountable
   Rather than roll back reforms wholesale, policymakers should insist on transparency in charging decisions, diversion effectiveness, and recidivism outcomes.

2. Adjust, Don’t Repeal, Bail Reform
   Risk-based release systems should respond to local feedback—permitting cash bail for high-risk repeat offenders if justified, while preserving access for low-risk individuals.

3. Invest in Community Safety
   Boost mental health services, violence intervention programs, and street outreach to curb root causes.

4. Use Data-Driven Policing
   Target hot spots with precision—ensure law enforcement is outfitted and distributed where needed without broad aggressive tactics.

5. Communication Matters
   Explain policy logic clearly. Public trust is vital: show how reducing incarceration fosters equity, while ensuring public safety isn’t sacrificed.

Final Thought

The truth about crime, bail reform, and prosecution philosophy is more nuanced than political slogans suggest.

• Crime trends—evaluated empirically—do not show bail reform or progressive DAs inherently causing spikes in crime.

• But public perceptions are powerful. For policy to succeed, it must yield both safety and legitimacy.

• The real failure lies not in reform, but in reform implemented without safeguards, clear communication, or support services.

So yes: some cities are facing serious crime waves—and while progressive policies may factor into their storyline, the data-driven consensus is clear: reforms alone are not the root cause. Effective, accountable governance and thoughtful community investment remain vital in preventing the very problems these reforms seek to solve.

Here’s a clear, state-by-state comparison of violent crime and homicide rates (per 100,000 people). These are the latest complete, comparable FBI state figures (2022); I’ve also added quick notes at the end on how 2023–2024 trends moved nationally and what studies say about bail reform. (District of Columbia is shown separately because it’s not a state.)

How to read this

• Violent crime includes murder/non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

• Homicide is shown separately (per 100k).

• Source for the state table: FBI Uniform Crime Reports via the consolidated state table.

State-by-state (alphabetical) — FBI 2022

• Alabama — Violent: 409.1 | Homicide: 10.9.

• Alaska — Violent: 758.9 | Homicide: 9.5.

• Arizona — Violent: 431.5 | Homicide: 6.8.

• Arkansas — Violent: 645.3 | Homicide: 10.2.

• California — Violent: 499.5 | Homicide: 5.7.

• Colorado — Violent: 492.5 | Homicide: 6.4.

• Connecticut — Violent: 150.0 | Homicide: 3.8.

• Delaware — Violent: 383.5 | Homicide: 4.8.

• Florida — Violent: 258.9 | Homicide: 5.0.

• Georgia — Violent: 367.0 | Homicide: 8.2.

• Hawaii — Violent: 259.6 | Homicide: 2.1.

• Idaho — Violent: 241.4 | Homicide: 2.7.

• Illinois — Violent: 287.3 | Homicide: 7.8.

• Indiana — Violent: 306.2 | Homicide: 6.2.

• Iowa — Violent: 286.5 | Homicide: 1.7.

• Kansas — Violent: 414.6 | Homicide: 4.6.

• Kentucky — Violent: 214.1 | Homicide: 6.8.

• Louisiana — Violent: 628.6 | Homicide: 16.1.

• Maine — Violent: 103.3 | Homicide: 2.2.

• Maryland — Violent: 398.5 | Homicide: 8.5.

• Massachusetts — Violent: 322.0 | Homicide: 2.1.

• Michigan — Violent: 461.0 | Homicide: 6.9.

• Minnesota — Violent: 280.6 | Homicide: 3.2.

• Mississippi — Violent: 245.0 | Homicide: 7.8.

• Missouri — Violent: 488.0 | Homicide: 10.1.

• Montana — Violent: 417.9 | Homicide: 4.5.

• Nebraska — Violent: 282.8 | Homicide: 3.2.

• Nevada — Violent: 454.0 | Homicide: 6.8.

• New Hampshire — Violent: 125.6 | Homicide: 1.8.

• New Jersey — Violent: 202.9 | Homicide: 3.1.

• New Mexico — Violent: 780.5 | Homicide: 12.0.

• New York — Violent: 429.3 | Homicide: 4.0.

• North Carolina — Violent: 405.1 | Homicide: 8.1.

• North Dakota — Violent: 279.6 | Homicide: 3.5.

• Ohio — Violent: 293.6 | Homicide: 6.1.

• Oklahoma — Violent: 419.7 | Homicide: 6.7.

• Oregon — Violent: 342.4 | Homicide: 4.5.

• Pennsylvania — Violent: 279.9 | Homicide: 7.9.

• Rhode Island — Violent: 172.3 | Homicide: 1.5.

• South Carolina — Violent: 491.3 | Homicide: 11.2.

• South Dakota — Violent: 377.4 | Homicide: 4.3.

• Tennessee — Violent: 621.6 | Homicide: 8.6.

• Texas — Violent: 431.9 | Homicide: 6.7.

• Utah — Violent: 241.8 | Homicide: 2.0.

• Vermont — Violent: 221.9 | Homicide: 3.4.

• Virginia — Violent: 234.0 | Homicide: 7.3.

• Washington — Violent: 375.6 | Homicide: 5.0.

• West Virginia — Violent: 277.9 | Homicide: 4.6.

• Wisconsin — Violent: 297.0 | Homicide: 5.3.

• Wyoming — Violent: 201.9 | Homicide: 2.6.

District of Columbia (not a state) — Violent: 812.3 | Homicide: 29.3.

Quick takeaways

• Highest violent-crime states (2022): New Mexico, Alaska, Louisiana, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina.

• Lowest violent-crime states (2022): Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wyoming, Vermont.

• 2024 national trend: The FBI reports violent crime fell ~4.5% in 2024 vs. 2023, continuing the post-2022 declines.

• Homicide (recent context): An Axios review of the latest FBI data highlights elevated homicide rates in parts of the rural South and West (e.g., Alaska, New Mexico), even as some large coastal states sit closer to national averages on a per-capita basis.

Where “no-cash bail / major bail limits” exist & what studies show (context)

• Illinois (cash bail eliminated 2023): One-year lookbacks suggest statewide violent & property crime fell ~12% after implementation.

• New Jersey (2017 reform): Academic work finds reduced incarceration with no increase in gun violence after reform.

• New York (2019–2020 reform with later tweaks): A quasi-experimental study in NYC found lower recidivism on eligible cases; no increase among those still eligible for bail.

• National backdrop: The FBI’s 2023 and 2024 releases show declining national violent crime, underscoring that broader trends don’t map neatly onto any single policy change.

By Poor Norman

#CrimeInAmerica #USCrimeRates #NoCashBail #BailReform #ProgressiveProsecutors #DistrictAttorneys #LawAndOrder #PublicSafety #UrbanCrime #CrimeStatistics #JusticeReform #USPolitics #CityCrime #CrimeDebate #PoorNorman

The post Rampant Crime and Reform: How No-Cash Bail and Progressive District Attorneys Are Reshaping Safety first appeared on Poor Norman News.

The post How Many Jobs Have Been Lost Due to Trump’s Cuts — by State first appeared on Poor Norman News.

Debate Performance: A Turning Point

Biden’s debate performance was expected to solidify his standing as the Democratic frontrunner. However, it instead highlighted significant issues that have since accelerated the decline of his campaign. Observers noted that Biden appeared unsteady and struggled to articulate his points clearly. His responses lacked the vigor and precision needed to reassure voters and counter the sharp criticisms from his opponents. This performance raised doubts about his fitness for another term, particularly among undecided voters and those within his own party who were already skeptical.

Public and Media Reaction

The immediate aftermath of the debate saw a flurry of negative media coverage and a shift in public opinion. Headlines focused on Biden’s gaffes and his inability to effectively counter arguments presented by other candidates. Social media platforms buzzed with discussions about his age and capacity to lead, with many users expressing disappointment and concern. Pundits and analysts who had previously been supportive began to question whether Biden could maintain the energy and clarity required for a rigorous election campaign.

Internal Campaign Turmoil

Within Biden’s campaign, the debate fallout has led to internal turmoil. Reports indicate that campaign staffers are divided on the path forward, with some pushing for a reevaluation of strategy and messaging. This discord has hampered the campaign’s ability to respond cohesively to the growing criticism. Fundraising efforts have also been impacted, as donors express apprehension about the viability of Biden’s candidacy moving forward.

Impact on Voter Confidence

Voter confidence in Biden has taken a significant hit. Polls conducted after the debate show a noticeable dip in his approval ratings. Key demographics that were crucial to his previous electoral success—such as suburban voters and independents—are now reconsidering their support. Additionally, younger voters, who were already less enthusiastic about Biden compared to other potential candidates, are increasingly vocal about their desire for new leadership within the Democratic Party.

Rivals Capitalize on Weaknesses

Biden’s rivals have not missed the opportunity to capitalize on his perceived weaknesses. Figures like Vice President Kamala Harris, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, and California Governor Gavin Newsom have ramped up their campaigns, emphasizing their vigor and readiness to lead. The contrast between their energetic performances and Biden’s debate showing has been stark, further highlighting the generational divide and the call for fresh leadership within the party.

Rebuilding the Campaign

To recover from this rapid disintegration, Biden’s campaign will need to undertake significant adjustments. First and foremost, there needs to be a focus on clear and compelling communication. Biden must address the concerns about his age and fitness head-on, perhaps by showcasing his achievements and ongoing policy initiatives more effectively. Engaging in smaller, more controlled public events where he can connect directly with voters might also help rebuild confidence.

The campaign should also consider bolstering its internal structure to ensure a unified response to criticisms. Bringing in new advisers or reshuffling the current team could provide a fresh perspective and renewed energy. Furthermore, addressing the internal discord and presenting a united front will be crucial in stabilizing the campaign.

In Closing

The rapid disintegration of Biden’s campaign post-debate is a stark reminder of the volatility inherent in political campaigns. While the challenges are significant, they are not insurmountable. With strategic adjustments and a focus on effective communication, there remains a path for Biden to regain his footing. However, the clock is ticking, and the coming weeks will be critical in determining whether his campaign can recover from this precipitous decline.

Poor Norman 2024

The post The Rapid Disintegration of Biden’s Campaign After His Debate Performance first appeared on Poor Norman News.

The post Can Anyone Other Than Joe Biden Beat Donald Trump in the 2024 Election? first appeared on Poor Norman News.

The post Opinion: Why Joe Biden Should Step Down as a Presidential Candidate first appeared on Poor Norman News.

1. Divisiveness and Polarization: During his presidency, Donald Trump was known for his confrontational rhetoric, which often deepened divisions within the country. Many people argue that his leadership style was characterized by inflammatory language, personal attacks, and a lack of respect for political opponents. They believe that this kind of behavior is detrimental to national unity and hampers the ability to address pressing issues effectively.
2. Questionable Ethical Conduct: Trump’s presidency was marred by a number of ethical controversies. His refusal to fully divest from his business interests raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, his decision not to release his tax returns fueled suspicions about his financial dealings. Critics argue that these actions eroded trust in the office of the president and compromised the integrity of the government.
3. Handling of COVID-19 Pandemic: Trump faced significant criticism for his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Critics argue that his administration downplayed the severity of the virus in its early stages, leading to delays in implementing effective public health measures. They also point to inconsistencies in messaging and clashes with health experts, which they believe hindered the pandemic response efforts.
4. Immigration Policies: Trump’s approach to immigration, particularly his hardline stance on border control and his efforts to implement travel bans targeting predominantly Muslim countries, sparked significant controversy. Critics argue that these policies were discriminatory and ran counter to American values of inclusivity and compassion.
5. Concerns about Democracy and Institutions: Some critics express concerns about the impact of Trump’s presidency on democratic norms and institutions. They argue that his repeated attacks on the media, judiciary, and intelligence agencies undermined public trust in these pillars of democracy. Additionally, controversies surrounding the 2020 election and Trump’s refusal to accept the results raised questions about his commitment to the peaceful transfer of power.

Public opinion is diverse, and political debates continue to shape the discourse around the topic.

Poor Norman

The post Why Donald Trump should never be the US President again. first appeared on Poor Norman News.

The post Lessons From Russia’s Blunders in Invading Ukraine first appeared on Poor Norman News.

COVID-19 pandemic

If the COVID-19 pandemic was a news story of 2022, it would not only be a disaster for humanity, but a huge economic burden as well. The number of deaths could be in excess of 2 million. This would have economic impacts for years to come, including postponements, cancellations, and unemployment.

In early 2019, the World Health Organization began tracking the spread of a novel coronavirus. It also began working with global experts to expand scientific knowledge. WHO and other partners are working to reduce the risk of infection.

While the virus has not yet reached epidemic levels, the number of cases continues to increase. The virus is a member of a large family of viruses, known as coronaviruses. Coronaviruses are capable of causing more severe disease than the common cold.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, more than one million Americans have died. But this figure represents just the first two years of the global outbreak. A massive vaccine effort has begun in conjunction with the World Bank Group and other partners.

In China, where the population is undervaccinated, and has limited supplies of treatments, the COVID-19 pandemic is a matter of survival. The country’s health authorities have started going door to door to distribute vaccines. However, they are concerned about the side effects of the vaccine.

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, the World Bank Group is working on the largest vaccination program in history. WHO is working with partners to expand the understanding of this new coronavirus.

Russian invasion of Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered forces to invade Ukraine on February 24. The resulting invasion began a nine-month battle, and has left nearly seven million Ukrainians displaced. It has also deepened Ukrainian national identity.

A poll conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology showed that 86% of Ukrainians supported the war. However, the majority of Ukrainians had a “bad” attitude towards Russia.

A Gallup poll found that 70% of Ukrainians are determined to fight to the end against Russia. Interestingly, the New York Times reported that an uptick in support for the Russian invasion had occurred.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has said he has doubts about the Russia-China relationship. He wants to discuss Ukraine with his counterpart, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

At a G20 Foreign Ministers meeting, Wang Yi reiterated China’s neutral stance on the war. While Wang Yi did not acknowledge Russia’s invasion, he urged maximum restraint on all sides, and called for curbing the “spillover effects” of the conflict.

China’s customs administration eased restrictions on Russian wheat imports after the inauguration of President Putin. Meanwhile, the Red Cross Society of China will provide $791.5 thousand in aid to Ukraine.

In the meantime, a Chinese government spokesperson has outlined four priorities for resolving the conflict. Specifically, Beijing has asked that the conflict be halted around nuclear facilities, and it has urged for humanitarian assistance.

Meanwhile, Xi and Putin met in Uzbekistan on the sidelines of the SCO summit. Xi did not mention the Ukraine invasion in his discussion with Putin. But he did ask for Germany’s participation in a Global Security Initiative.

Animal relocation is helping euthanasia rates plummet

Despite some progress, many animals are still being euthanized in our homes and on our streets. The ASPCA’s Relocation program is doing its part to save a few of these creatures by partnering with high-kill shelters and bringing them to locations where they can get adopted.

Besides helping euthanasia rates plummet, the ASPCA also helps to strengthen programs in partner shelters. To date, 70 shelters have shut down gas chambers. In fact, the ASPCA’s relocation program is also helping to keep cats and dogs from spreading diseases like rabies.

Some animal welfare organizations, like PETA, have even gotten in on the action. For instance, in 2019, they euthanized 1,614 animals. Not only is this an improvement on the previous year, it is the best year since the group started tracking euthanasia rates.

In addition to pet euthanasia, shelters are euthanizing a wide range of other creatures. Dogs and cats, for instance, are killed for reasons ranging from overcrowding to medical issues. Among these are behavioral problems. Aside from the aforementioned sexism, a sex-related issue can also cause an animal to be left in a high-kill shelter, resulting in the dreaded death.

As for the ASPCA’s Relocation program, they do a great job in keeping cats and dogs from dying a miserable death. Their relocation efforts include providing guidance and resources to partner shelters. Having an active relocation program is a good idea because it allows the organization to source the shelters they work with. It is also a good way to reduce overcrowding.

Brazilian elections

Brazilians cast their ballots for president on Sunday. A vote that was widely seen as a rebuke to the nation’s erratic leadership. The election was marked by an ugly campaign, which raised concerns that the nation’s democratic institutions are in decline.

The race has been marred by allegations of fraud, and Brazil’s electoral authorities are working to increase transparency. However, the election has roiled the country, with a number of violent attacks on candidates and police, and a high rate of voter dissatisfaction.

In a recent survey, voters said the economy and corruption were the top two concerns. But the election has sparked deep divisions between supporters of the two candidates. Both have promised to fight corruption, while tackling crime and growth.

Lula da Silva, a former Brazilian president, ran on a platform of social justice, poverty reduction, and environmental protection. His Workers’ Party also pledged to boost taxes on the rich, and a debt forgiveness program.

Bolsonaro, a right-wing nationalist, has promised to crack down on graft and corruption, and increase spending on education and health. He has also loosened gun laws and rolled back environmental regulations.

Bolsonaro’s efforts have drew international attention and a flurry of accusations. Bolsonaro has said that da Silva was a pedophile, cannibal, and Satanist. And his allies have questioned his sexual morals and the way he treats Indigenous communities.

The first round of legislative elections is set for October 30. If no candidate gains 50% of the vote, a runoff will take place.

Betty White’s 100th birthday

Betty White was a popular entertainer who has appeared on numerous television shows. She was also a dedicated animal rights activist. Her career spanned eight decades.

White became a household name in her 80s. After appearing on sitcoms and game shows, she was a star on the small screen. Among her many accomplishments, she was a member of the Television Hall of Fame. As the first woman to be a producer of a national TV show, she was a pioneer.

She was awarded eight Emmys, three American Comedy Awards, and a Grammy. She received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in 1988.

Betty White is known for her performances on “Hot in Cleveland,” “The Mary Tyler Moore Show,” and “The Golden Girls.” She received accolades for her work on these and other shows.

The anniversary event was to be held at her Brentwood home. It was to include special guests such as Clint Eastwood, Ryan Reynolds, and Tina Fey.

A documentary about the actress will premiere on January 17, 2022. This movie will explore the highlights of her long career.

The film will also examine the importance of her advocacy on behalf of animals. Several actors and celebrities will participate in the film, including Ryan Reynolds, Robert Redford, and Morgan Freeman.

In addition to the stars, the film will also showcase key interviews that reveal the life and career of Betty White.

By Norman Gregory

The post Top News Stories of 2022 first appeared on Poor Norman News.

Jonathan Pollock

Jonathan Daniel Pollock, a man from Lakeland, Florida, has been charged with assaulting multiple police officers with a deadly weapon. He has been accused of a violent entry into the Capitol building and using a shield to attack three law enforcement officers.

Federal agents tracked Pollock while he was in California and Florida, and the fugitive is believed to have friends and family in several states. A reward of $15,000 was offered for the arrest of Pollock in March. This has since doubled. It is believed that the FBI has active surveillance on the Pollock family.

Pollock was part of a group of friends and family from Polk County. He also has a sister, who is in court awaiting trial.

The affidavit lists the suspects, including charges, where they are from, and their status. Some have ties to right-wing extremist groups.

Guy Wesley Reffitt

After a jury convicted Guy Wesley Reffitt of five crimes associated with his involvement in the January 6th Insurrectionist attack, he was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. His sentence is the longest yet imposed for any defendant involved in the Capitol riot.

According to the FBI, Mr Reffitt was part of a militia-style Three Percenters movement. These groups are named after a small percentage of the colonial US population that fought against the British in the War of Independence.

The jury found Reffitt guilty of five counts, including obstructing an official proceeding, carrying a firearm during a civil disturbance, and transporting a firearm during a civil disturbance. He was sentenced to serve at least three years of supervised release.

The charges against Mr Reffitt stem from his actions on January 6, 2021, when he went to the U.S. Capitol wearing body armor and a helmet, and armed with a semiautomatic handgun.

Michael Perkins

The list of insurrectionist convictions involving the Capitol riots in 2021 includes several Floridians. Among them, Jonathan Pollock stands out. He was a part of a group of rioters who slammed into the police line and then engaged in tug-of-war style conflict. During the attack, he also broke an officer’s grasp.

Another prominent rioter was Joshua Christopher Doolin. He was a member of the group that pushed through the Capitol Police. His family and friends were reportedly gathered around him when he was arrested.

In addition to Pollock, dozens of other rioters are in jail. Some are accused of participating in the insurrection, while others were arrested for their roles in destroying property or assaulting law enforcement officers.

One of the most serious charges is seditious conspiracy, which can carry a prison sentence of more than five years. Other charges involve violent entry into the Capitol grounds, disorderly conduct in a restricted building, and obstructing an official proceeding.

Olivia Pollock

Despite the fact that many rioters have been put behind bars, a number of Floridians are still at large, accused of participating in the deadly Capitol insurrection. Some of them have been linked to right-wing extremist groups. And the FBI is reportedly actively looking for them.

In a federal investigation, prosecutors have primarily relied on social media posts. But they are also seeking financial records and credit card information. Depending on the standard of evidence, agents can get court orders to review these records. Using a “trap and trace” device, agents can track all calls from a particular phone line.

A federal statute makes it illegal to cross state lines to avoid prosecution. The FBI was able to monitor Pollock’s movements while in California. It also tracked him when he was in Florida.

By Norman Gregory

The post January 6th Insurrectionist Convictions first appeared on Poor Norman News.

Asylum seekers flee violence, persecution, and natural disasters

Increasingly, migrants are fleeing violence, persecution, and natural disasters at the United States Southern Border. This includes people who want to reconnect with family members already living in the United States. Some are fleeing poverty, while others are seeking work opportunities or a better life.

A Congressional Research Service report notes that family ties are among the key drivers of migration flows. However, many migrant demographics are also vulnerable to the dangers of reentry, and many could become victims of violence if they return home.

The United States Refugee Admissions Program provides temporary protections in the United States. Resettlement agencies place refugees in the best-suited communities for their successful integration into American society. They offer a range of services, including language interpreters, medical assistance, and housing. These services are monitored by local affiliates, who assess the resources available in the community.

Electronic monitoring of non-detained migrants

Electronic monitoring of non-detained migrants at the United States southern border is a growing practice. An ankle bracelet enables government officials to track the movements of a migrant. This technology could help ICE make decisions on whether to remove a migrant or grant a release.

Ankle monitors are a good example of the technology that ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are using. They can be used as a means of monitoring a released individual, or as a guarantee for an immigration bond. However, ankle monitors have been criticized for their potential use as a form of detention.

Another method of electronic monitoring involves the use of a phone app. The SmartLINK phone app tracks 255,602 people, including a large percentage of the 316,700 people who are enrolled in ICE’s Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program.

Expulsion of Venezuelans by air

There is an increasing number of Venezuelans arriving at the U.S. Southern Border. The latest Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report showed that 33,000 more arrived in September.

Many of the Venezuelans are seeking asylum in the United States. However, their ability to enter the US is restricted. They must be screened by national security vetting, and have a sponsor in the U.S. If their application is approved, they can apply for work authorization.

The program that will allow 24,000 Venezuelans to enter the US through air is modeled after a similar offer made by Ukraine when Russia invaded its country in April. That program offered safe haven for more than 100,000 Ukrainians.

This is not the first time that the Biden administration has attempted to pressure the Mexican government to accept expulsions of its own citizens. It has been unsuccessful.

Seasonal migration patterns

One of the biggest challenges facing the federal government is establishing an orderly and safe process for the recent wave of migrants who have been crossing the United States Southern Border. The influx of migrants from Central America and other parts of the Western Hemisphere is causing some concern.

A number of experts believe that climate change is playing a role in the migration phenomenon, but it is not the sole factor. Other factors such as economic hardships have intensified migration trends.

The United States has been through a series of extraordinary migration events. In the 1860s the Civil War stopped immigration, while in the 1880s and ’90s the third wave of European immigrants arrived via New York’s Ellis Island. During World War I, the third wave slowed down considerably, while during the 1920s the numerical quotas on immigration slowed down the flow even more.

Republicans embrace increasingly extreme rhetoric around immigration

During the recent presidential campaign, a surge of rhetoric from Republicans fueled the anti-immigrant movement. The new President’s call for building a wall along the southern border was reminiscent of traditional anti-immigrant narratives. But Trump’s strategy may have actually been a symptom of a more serious Republican project.

Over the last ten years, the anti-immigrant fervor has become mainstream. This is due to the fact that well-established anti-immigrant groups have established a foothold in the political arena. They promote divisive rhetoric and use conspiracy theories to justify their harsh anti-immigrant views. Ultimately, however, the majority of anti-immigrant voices come from fringe groups.

For example, the Patriot Front is a Texas-based group that specializes in promoting anti-immigrant views. Some members of this group have white supremacist beliefs.

By Norman Gregory

The post What is Going on at the United States Southern Border? first appeared on Poor Norman News.